
|
|
Eric Hsu posted on January 03, 2011 23:56

To read Part 1 of this story, CLICK HERE!
In part 1, I mentioned that the original delivery date of the engine was to be mid-October to allow the guys at BMC Tool Racing team ample time to test and develop the car. There really wouldn't be ample time to fully develop a car in a month and a half, but MJ and TJ had to make the best of it. Due to delays in piston delivery, we had to give BMC Tool a revised engine delivery date of November 15. With the 25 Hours of Thunderhill happening on December 4, the team would really only have a couple of days for testing and shake down before making the trip from Los Angeles to Thunderhill let alone any development. While Cosworth makes one of the finest pistons in the world, the factories also seem to put everything second to F1. The Mazda MZR pistons are made on the same machines by the same machinists as pistons for the CA2010 F1 engines.

These are some of our standard normally aspirated 11:1 Duratec pistons. While they don't look like anything fancy from this angle, it's the details that set them apart from the bulk of the American shelf pistons. A proprietary 4000 series alloy (these things do not crumble apart like your typical 4032), triple barrel shaped skirts, offset pin, tool steel pins, strutted pin boss supports, unique pin oiling, fully milled under crowns, and abrasive paste deburring (aka extrude hone) on the undersides are a few details that set them apart from other off the shelf offerings.
What happened once the engine got on the dyno was a bit difficult to remember because it all happened so fast due to all of the coffee, late nights, fast food and 18 hour days (luckily I quit smoking because those would have been 2 pack days), but after a problem with a piston ring, the engine had to be removed from the dyno. At Cosworth, there are only usually thoroughly developed engine programs and rarely is anything done on a custom basis. Since we do not normally build turbo Mazda DISI engines for customer use, we basically stuck to a combination of internal parts that were proven on the dyno in past turbo Mazda DISI engine projects...except for the piston rings. For some reason we have multiple 87.5mm Duratec piston rings that have very similar part numbers and very similar dimensions, but were mixed up. With the wrong ring in the right groove (not enough groove depth), let's just say we had some issues...
Since we did not have oversized pistons, a new block was needed since the bores were scuffed up by the incorrect rings. At this point we already had to tell BMC Tool that we would have to push the engine's delivery date back another week to November 22 giving them even less time to test, tune, and develop the car. Since the car would have many new parts and systems on it such as the radiator, intercooler, turbo system, gearbox oiling, oil cooling, sensors for data logging, new damper valving, new spring rates, etc. it was important to get some track time to at least shake down the car. In my opinion, I didn't think the car was quite ready for the engine anyway. There was MJ, TJ, David, and a couple other guys working on the car at this point and while the car was slowly beginning to look like a car again, I thought even if they had an engine, they would still be almost a week anyway. It turns out I was kind of right since they could have used the engine a couple days earlier than November 22.

The Garrett GT3076R with .82 A/R turbine housing is nestled deep inside of this cluster of tubes. Due to the lack of time, we ended up using a cast iron exhaust manifold sourced from the guys at Mazda Motorsports. While it is far from optimum for a race car, it did the job at low boost levels. Since the turbo positioning wouldn't work directly off the exhaust manifold, an "extension" was made to locate the turbo lower. This was also far from ideal, but also did the trick. A TiAL MV-S water cooled wastegate bypassed the excess exhaust gasses from the turbine stage. A TiAL Q 50mm BOV handled the blow off valve duties. The exhaust system was 3" from turbo to the tip and was quieted further by a Coast Fabrication custom 3" internal diameter muffler. With the turbo and muffler, the car turned out to be the absolute quietest car on the track. Whenever it was on the front straight, you would only hear the wine of the straight cut gears.

The XS Engineering 18" x 10" x 3" tube and fin intercooler with a pair of their modified CT9A EVO end tanks handled intercooler duties. It was 6.2 pounds lighter than the original stacked plate core that was originally considered. Cast aluminum end tanks were used because welded tanks were considered a potential point of failure with the constant on and off boost over 25 hours. With more time to test, I'm sure a welded or formed sheet aluminum piece could have been tested, but there was no time. Cast it was. Underneath the intercooler is a giant C&R oil cooler from a Mazda Rotary powered version of the Panoz DP-02 that Star Mazda builds for a race series. The oil cooler is even longer than the intercooler. The long intercooler tube is still shorter than many front mount intercooler systems in street cars. There were absolutely zero turbo lag complaints from the drivers.
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 8:53 AM
Great Writeup! Did you guys specifically choose the TiAL wastegate because of the water cooling aspect for endurance racing?
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 1:59 PM
Do you guys put timing marks on your Duratec/MZR engines, or do you use the factory tools for timing them/make your own?
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:06 PM
Ryan: The water cooling was an added bonus and a piece of mind, but it wasn't a determining factor. Part of the reason we used the MV-S was also because we had them. Romulan: We use the factory tools for cam timing during installation, but we also grind our cams with different lobe centers. For different applications we are able to pull a cam off the shelf with different lobe centers. We have also made indexed cam sprockets for development purposes so we can physically adjust cam timing when necessary.
Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:11 PM
Question on the dry sump. What are you using to draw vacuum? And do you mind explaining the complete scavenge system? Tying to plan a turbo BMW build while learning as much as I can to do it correctly the 1st time -Pat

Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:32 PM
Brap: You a rasta? Anyhow, vacuum is created by the dry sump pump rotors in each stage or section. The entire scavenge system in this Mazda engine consists of three stages of scavenge rotors that evacuate the crankcase. The pumps will suck air, oil, boost, blow-by and anything else in the crankcase and spit them out to the oil tank. Then the pressure stage of the oil pump will draw oil from your tank. So if you look at the pump above, it has 4 scavenge stages (red colored) and 1 pressure stage (gold colored). The scavenge stages are wide gerotor pumps and the pressure stage has a super wide pressure stage. This is a pump that I used on another Nissan RB26 engine that came from a NASCAR engine builder. The good old boys really know their dry sumps racing around ovals and shit on slicks for the last 50 years. The red pump is more universal and can be mounted on the side of your engine. The dry sump system on the Mazda engine is baller spec with the pumps sitting inside of the sump and the sump bolting to the cylinder block and driven by the crankshaft with a separate chain. You owe me $10 for googling this diagram for you. What kind of BMW engine are you building?
Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:25 AM
Always a delight to read from people who know their stuff. Hopefully the guys at my IT won't exclude the motoiq.com domain at our firewall :-) Best regards for everyone at the IQ staff and have a great 2011. Pedro
Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:23 PM
Thanks Eric, that clears that issue up entirely. as for the engine, at this point I'm set on an M52b28tu or M54b30 around 9.0:1 - 10.0:1 compression with a variable toybo aiming for 575whp on 93 octane. if that falls through, then a 13b, again variable toybo, around 450whp. in an E36. I love going against the norm and I'm hoping it will be a great learning experience.
Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:59 AM
Eric, I was wondering how much vacuum is inside a dry sump system. I just remember in elementary school that they showed a rock and a feather inside two vacuum tubes and the rock and feather would fall at the same rate because there was no wind resistance. I thought that experiment was super cool. So was wondering if the vacuum inside the engine is at the same strength as in those vacuum tubes in the experiment. I mean if you started from atmospheric pressure inside a vacuum tube and then gradually lowered the pressure while repeatedly making the rock and feather fall, then the rate of the feather falling would be proportion to the amount of vacuum applied. But it would have to reach a certain vacuum level for both feather and rock to fall at the same rate. I was trying to find how much vacuum it takes to make a rock and feather fall at the same rate but haven't found it yet. Will try again tomorrow.
Friday, January 07, 2011 1:02 AM
Jim, If you are an American, you haven't been in touch with some experiments made during the Apollo programme that took you guys to the moon. In one of flights, the austronaut's performed that very same test, in the most dramatic way, using the moon's undisputed total absence of athmosphere, and proved Mr. Galileo was right. Here you can find that historic moment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk
Friday, January 07, 2011 3:56 AM
Marillionado, Apollo 15 was 2 years before I was born but that doesn't mean that I don't love past space programs. I've seen that video before but what I was curious about was if the inside of an engine could generate the same conditions as on the moon, generally speaking. Enough where wind resistance was not an issue. Glad to know that there are others out there interested in space.
Friday, January 07, 2011 4:25 AM
Generally speaking, I guess what I really want to know is if the inside of the engine has no wind resistance. Vacuum is anything below your base. There are vacuum gauges that measure different strengths of vacuum. So do the internals of the engine enjoy the same lack of wind resistance as a feather falling as fast as a rock?
Friday, January 07, 2011 8:15 AM
Eric, what an epic thrash. That engine is everything I'd want. What were the valve sizes? I'll check to see if I can find the information at the Cosworth website. This was the first time in 6 years that I didn't go to Thunderhill for the event. I hear it was quite the hell, weather wise. Can't wait to see the next installment. Bob

Friday, January 07, 2011 7:07 PM
Brap: Interesting, but if you don't have the engine yet shouldn't you be trying to get a S5x engine? BMW really does load up their M engines with features from race engines such as cross flow cooling in the head, individual throttles, better castings, etc. It isn't "against the grain", but BMW M3/M5 engine are truly pieces of very nice engineering. You'll enjoy the results more I think. Jim: I believe zero G occurs only in an absolute vacuum such as space. Gravity and wind resistance are two different things, but I'm not sure about wind resistance vs. vacuum however. Perhaps zero wind resistance also exists only in an absolute vacuum also. The amount of vacuum in this particular engine depends on how fast we drive the scavenge pumps. In this case the crankcase pressure (or vacuum depending on the units) reads as low as 600 mbar. I have no idea what the conversion is to inHg or negative psig. Horse/Bob: This engine is pretty sweet. I wish I had one in one of my projects. The weather was absolutely miserable, cars were crashing all over the place, and there were yellows up the ass. It was madness!
Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:05 AM
Eric, i would have thought that a crank for a DP car would be knife edged. No? Great write up! Mike
Saturday, January 08, 2011 8:55 AM
high vacuum in the crank case is good stuff. It reduces the windage losses, so it basically frees up some power. I posted in the forums a long time back, I think about the Ferrari 458 engine that runs a significant amount of vacuum to help make more power.

Monday, January 10, 2011 1:31 AM
You will have 0 g's as long as a body is not pulling on another body. We know that wind resistance is caused by an objected hitting molecules and thus slowing down, like a meteor. Measuring vacuum would be measuring the lack of air molecules or any other particles in a volume of space. So if I threw a ball and it never came in contact with an opposing force like molecules or particles then it would never face any resistance and go on forever at a constant speed. I found this link about atmosphere and mbar. The higher you go in the atmosphere the less air, or more vacuum, there is. I'm not sure if his gauge is the same as yours though. http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/77/ It is important to have an understanding of the average height of each of these important levels. 1000 mb is near the surface (sea level), 850 mb is near 1,500 meters (5,000 ft), 700 mb is near 3,000 meters (10,000 ft), 500 mb is near 5,500 meters (18,000 ft), 300 mb is near 9,300 meters (30,000 ft).
 
|
|
MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:
|