Page Options
  Minimize
17

First Kyong sent me an email with a picture of a slammed Nissan Juke on 18" TE37s. This sparked a thought since I'm in the market to replace my trusty '96 Maxima daily beater. I am looking for a car that I can drive fast on a daily basis without attracting too much attention. I'm not talking about cut everybody off like an asshole kind of fast, but just fast enough to get from point A to point B quicker than the average person because I'm always late to everything. The Maxima has enough power for the task with the ultra reliable VQ30DE and decent curb weight (before Maximas became the fat asses they are today). The Tokico shocks, Tein springs, 2000 17" Maxima wheels, Bridgestones, and Axxis Metal Master front pads help big time in the handling department. Don't be surprised if you see a dark metallic grey '96 Maxima late brake, turn in, and late apex right past your ass on a freeway transfer ramp somewhere in LA because that's probably me kicking ass to a meeting that I'm late to. Even though there's a good chance the Maxima will go another 100,000 miles with basic maintenace, I figured it's time to change it up. Nissan's new Juke with the MR16DDT engine is looking like a pretty good daily beater that I can drive fast while staying under the radar. It's either a Juke or a 2006 Benz E55, but that's a different story (resale value sucks big time on E55s).


The styling's going to take a little getting used to, but some wheels and/or an extreme murdering out might fix it. Styling is secondary for a daily beater as long as it isn't an ugly turd. It's the performance and ability to drive fast under the radar that interests me the most.

Then I sent an email to Paul over at Nissan Motosports asking him if there were any details about the Juke or the MR16DDT engine that I needed to know about. He gave me a list of features, but he said that was all the info he had on it since it was basically a brand new engine. The list of features are available to the public now that the car is released, but here they are:

  • 1.6L direct injection turbocharged in-line 4
  • Sodium filled exhaust valves (a Nissan favorite)
  • Beehive valve springs
  • Twin variable camshafts
  • Designed in conjunction with Renault (they have the Francs)
  • Nano finished camshafts (smooth Ra = low friction)
  • Hydrogen free DLC coated lifter buckets
  • Four counterweight crankshaft (lighter)
  • Primary and Secondary injection events (see video on next page)
  • Stratified combustion (Nissan claims)
  • Electronic engine mount (I wonder if it's like Porsche's?)

With all of these ultra cool features, I wonder if the MR16DDT will be Renault and/or Nissan's entry as the global race engine? Imagine an MR16 in F1 and WRC. Now that would be cool as hell knowing that your Juke engine is also in some of the fastest cars in the world.

These are some really cool features for a low buck mass produced econo car engine. Naturally being an engine nerd, I'm really interested in the MR16DDT. Probably more so than the Juke itself, but if that's the only way I'm going to get an MR16DDT, then so be it. The Juke sounds like a pretty good bang for the buck too starting at under $20,000 and getting 32mpg on the highway. There's even an AWD option, but unfortunately the AWD only comes with a CVT transmission. That's not a problem for my purposes of using the Juke as a fast daily beater, but it would have been even better with a 6 speed manual. The power delivery of a CVT coupled to a turbo engine would probably take some getting used to, but as long as I'm hauling ass on demand I'm happy.

Pages: 1 of 2 Next Page

Comments

rsmotors
# rsmotors
Sunday, October 17, 2010 9:38 AM
Ha thats to weird I just emailed my local dealership getting them to let me know when one comes in so I can test drive it, the wife needs a new set of wheels.
OMG Its Weasel
# OMG Its Weasel
Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:37 AM
ive always wanted to drive a turbo car with a CVT.
i cant imagine, with the nature of CVTs, that they can handle much power.
i dont know about you, but turbo, CVT, and AWD sounds like a lot of fun.
AlexSpecV
# AlexSpecV
Sunday, October 17, 2010 11:03 AM
Funny i just got back from a training course for this. The Juke itself i believe is nothing more than a test bed for this engine and the AWD as well as the new multi-display unit. I believe it was made to find a niche` market but also to test the durability of this motor as i think they will use it to replace the QR. Equal power output, and better fuel economy and not sure but could be somewhat lighter.

The MR16DDT does use stratified combustion but only for approx 30 seconds to a minute on initial start-up. You can feel it, cause the engine is kind of lopey and the idle is slightly irratic. Its for quick warm-up. After that time it switches to a Homogenous combustion. From what i understand the primary and secondary injection events are only during stratified combustion. Once it starts homogenous combustion it is only doing a primary injection.

I think this motor will be very interesting and holds potential. Can't wait for the a/m to get their hands on it and see what can be done. The turbo on this thing is tiny. Max boost when I asked is 12 Psi, but the waste gate begins to open at 9 psi.
Fly'n_Z
# Fly'n_Z
Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:34 PM
No six speed on the AWD makes it a no for me but otherwise I'm impressed by the collection of technologies on display in this vehicle.
trailbrake2088
# trailbrake2088
Sunday, October 17, 2010 8:35 PM
I read this and thought oh yeah the sentra is probably going to get this engine. Also nissan seems to build two or three awesome engines and stick them in everthing. I wonder if the 240sx/silvia will get a variant of this engine. It looks awesome can't wait to see the tuning potential for this one. Good article and video!
Eric Hsu
# Eric Hsu
Sunday, October 17, 2010 9:20 PM
AlexSpecV: I believe it is a replacement for the QR25. On the Nissan Japan PR website, there's some text that says the MR16DDT has similar output to a 2.5L engine, but the fuel consumption of a 1.8L.

I wonder why they got rid of the stratified combustion after warm up. That's a pretty big advantage they're giving up. I'm sure it improves cold start emissions a good deal also.
Leon
# Leon
Sunday, October 17, 2010 9:53 PM
Rather than using stratified injection, why not just use direct injection instead? Am I looking at this in a too simplified fashion?
Leon
# Leon
Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:18 PM
Just went back and checked out that slammed Juke. It looks a little like what North American enthusiasts have been clamoring for, a hot hatch! Albeit an ugly one. Although you got to give to Nissan for thinking out of the box.
spdracerut
# spdracerut
Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:38 PM
Stratified injection is different than direct injection if I have my terms correct. Direct injection is simply injecting fuel directly into the combustion chamber. Stratified is getting only the proper air:fuel right at the plug, and being lean everywhere else. So, the trick is getting the proper mixture only at plug, and that's probably only possible under very specific conditions. Curious as to why it's only startup and not all idle conditions.
8695Beaters
# 8695Beaters
Monday, October 18, 2010 8:46 AM
If they use this in a sports car, it will have to be bored out a bit. Think of a 2.oL version of this motor in a new Silvia! It would blow the old SR20 out of the water and make everyone forget how bad the QR was.
mikemiessler
# mikemiessler
Monday, October 18, 2010 10:07 AM
finally my dreams of an awd turbo versa are coming to fruition! Let's be honest thats all the Juke is (except the Versa is prettier)
The Blue
# The Blue
Monday, October 18, 2010 11:31 AM
on the daily driver front, why not wait for someone to wreck a juke and put the engine into a used versa?
Peter Medina
# Peter Medina
Monday, October 18, 2010 11:38 AM
Eric- I'm not too worried about CAFE and being able to reach targets, the problem is the metric, MPG sucks as a metric if it isn't further qualified by the type of fuel. 80's gasoline wouldn't be a problem for CAFE, but E15 or worse yet E85 IS a major hurdle if the metric is MPG. If the environment is really the goal then MPG needs to go away so that lower energy Alt fuels can take stage.

I also wouldn't count out Ford's small engine program, they have some really bright people over there.
Nikolas@Redline
# Nikolas@Redline
Monday, October 18, 2010 1:17 PM
Small displacement, direct-injected & turbo-charged engines are going to make up a considerable % of all engines 5+ years from now. Very cool indeed!

Now if only Turbo Diesel became more popular with the manufacturers.. but there are several active conspiracies as to why that won't happen any time soon in the USA... (Oil Co's + OEM's + US Govt = No go)

Peter Medina
# Peter Medina
Monday, October 18, 2010 1:44 PM
Nik- Personally, I don't think the OEM's care. I was at the NAIPC, an invite-only meeting for the top OEM's in North America. Part of my break-out session was called "how do we get Americans to adopt more diesel." All of this considering that Europe is at 80% share on pass car diesels.

Top OEM strategists, are fine with more Diesel. The problem is Diesel is still dependency on oil, and that my friends is a National Security problem for the US. I think that the DOE is waiting for a new feed stock for a new fuel to become viable that will take us away from petroleum.

OEMs know that diesels will burn any fuel of the future, so it is coming, just a matter of when.
Rockwood
# Rockwood
Monday, October 18, 2010 2:56 PM
CVT is much better than an automatic, IMO, if that's what you're after. Seamless, effortless (mostly, except at heavy loads) acceleration and good fuel economy. The extended Nissan warranty is nice as well.

BTW, if you have a CVT and are getting the recall done for low speed rattling (firmware update), make sure to check to see if your fans are plugged in before leaving. We didn't. RIP 2008 Rogue.
Der Bruce
# Der Bruce
Monday, October 18, 2010 3:57 PM
Eric, nice to see you looking at the motor so closely. I think it is the future 4-cyl motor nissan will stick with for the forseeable future. When I first saw the specs on the Juke, I thought to myself (and my wife who could care less) that someone needs to get the AWD, swap in the manual, lower it like that one with the Volks, put some light weight rally wheels on it, bump the power and show Nissan what a sellable and WRC-ready product looks like! I couldn't think of someone better to show Nissan how to do it better!
Der Bruce
# Der Bruce
Monday, October 18, 2010 4:15 PM
AKA, you Eric!
AlexSpecV
# AlexSpecV
Monday, October 18, 2010 5:29 PM
Eric, from what information i could probe out of the instructors it would appear that during stratified ignition there is a noticeable "miss" i suppose you could call it. Not technically a miss but its almost like a cammed motor. Its very irratic, rpm will travel +/- 300rpms at times. So i'm thinking the reason why they didn't keep using the stratified ignition was more for NVH reasons. They said that on the Juke its not that bad because the 4 cylinder doesn't seem to be as noticeable. On the new 5.6L Direct Injected motor in the new M he said on that vehicle its very noticeable and have already had customer complaints about it. So thats what i'm thinking as to why they didn't keep it at all times. Where as during homogenous its smoother. Once you get a chance (if you don't already have a juke on hand) sit in one once its cold and just pay attention to the RPM gauge. You'll feel the ECM switch over from stratified to homogenous combustion. Its not a big difference but if you pay attention you'll notice it. I'm curious as to what its like in the M.
tyndago
# tyndago
Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:41 AM
Its the right engine, in the wrong body. Imagine how cool it would have been if this would have been in the S16. Even the numbering to engine displacement would have made sense.
Burninator
# Burninator
Tuesday, October 19, 2010 12:59 PM
I was just saying to a friend last week that it might make a sweet driver if you lowered it and boosted the power. It definitely disappointed me that it's not available with AWD and a manual, but I think I'd rather go with FWD and get a manual than get stuck with the CVT just because I wanted AWD. For a daily driver you don't really need AWD anyways.
Dusty Duster
# Dusty Duster
Tuesday, October 19, 2010 5:45 PM
I'd consider one of those Nissans, too, if it wasn't so freaking ugly.
Nick
# Nick
Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:27 PM
This motor looks awesome. The chassis it comes in, not so much. However, since the motor is considered a ULEV does that mean no smog?
Rockwood
# Rockwood
Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:02 PM
Still need to smog it, just not for the first 5 years of ownership by the original owner.
ANDYman
# ANDYman
Monday, October 25, 2010 2:24 PM
http://fancytuning.com/2010/09/nissan-juke-custom-photoshop/nissan-juke-custom/
Markingtime
# Markingtime
Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:40 PM
I have been a fan of the turbo charged GDI engine for some time. I expect to see a lot more in the future. I believe Mitsubishi had the first in 2000 with their 4G93 1.8L GDI Turbo featuring a 10:1 compression ratio (but not sure on the boost).
http://autospeed.com/cms/title_Mitsubishis-Direct-Injection-Turbo-18/A_1063/article.html . Ford's Eco Boost engine is a V6 GDI turbo. Nissan's MR16DDT looks like it is going to be the next hot little contender.

I would sure love to see a build in this category to see what they can really do.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.

          MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:


Copyright 2012 by MotoIQ.com
Privacy StatementTerms Of UseAdvertise