Page Options
You are here : Magazine Articles
  Minimize
28

Locking Ring
The Comp-Gate40 does not use allen screws around the perimeter of the spring hat. It uses a trick "locking ring”. The benefits of the locking ring are no more stripped allen screws, no more stripped hat bases, much easier spring changes, spring changes in less than a minute (if you got your shit together), and an overall reduced height wastegate which allows greater flexibility of wastegate placement.  


The notches in the locking rings are for the toothed spanner wrench.


The oversized stainless heat shield under the aluminum base reminds me of the old school Porsche wastegates. Pictured here is the base 7psi spring.

Reduced Package Size with no Sacrifice in Gas Flow
The Comp-Gate40 is only 99mm (3.89”) tall, but still has .582” of valve lift. It also only measures 74mm (2.91") at its largest diameter making the Comp-Gate40 probably the smallest wastegate on the market. I am told that a lot of time was spent on a flowbench to optimize the valve head shape and valve seat profile to ensure gas flow was not sacrificed for a small package wastegate.


The Comp-Gate40's truly small size allows it to be placed in extremely tight engine bays (e.g. Lexus SC430/GS430, BMW E46 M3, BMW E39 M5, Nissan Z33 350Z etc.).

Unique Rotating Cap
The spring hat can be indexed in 12 different positions allowing for greater installation flexibility. The rotation can also be done in less than a minute by only loosening the locking ring. This really does make things go quicker during the setup of a new custom installation.


Nearly infinite hose and fitting positioning means no more burnt hoses and cleaner looking installations.

Once installed on the SSE EVO, there were no changes required to the closed loop boost control PIDs in the Pectel SQ6 ECU. Closed loop boost control was flawless.

Pages: 2 of 3 Previous Page Next Page

Comments

czubaka
# czubaka
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:56 AM
I read something interesting the other day regarding the quality of Chinese manufacturing. They copied the engine used in the Su-33 for use in their J-11B, which is itself a copy of the Su-33. The Russian build engines last 400hrs between overhauls (not sure if major-core replacement-or minor). The best the Chinese can muster is 30hrs between rebuilds. And that's utilizing their best manufacturing capabilities. I don't want to imagine what kind of garbage they use for knock-off car parts.
Dusty Duster
# Dusty Duster
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 8:27 AM
@czubaka:
That sounds about right to me. Do you have a source for that info?
Seagondollar
# Seagondollar
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:26 AM
Likewise I know there are some chainsaws that have a design life of 50 hours. Some old Roman coined the phrase: "Caveat Emptor" Let the buyer beware) to cover their garbage. I would suppose there is some good Chinese production, but when the Japanese started making things after WWII they gained a reputation for cheap cr@p. I guess it's a evolutionary thing.
Djdare
# Djdare
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 1:19 PM
@ season, read about W. E. Demming if you are curious about japan and their road to manufacturing success. He's an interesting dude, and many say he was very instrumental in helping the Japanese to build quality into their manufacturing processes.

http://www.tpmonline.com/articles_on_total_productive_maintenance/management/deming14steps.htm
jeffball610
# jeffball610
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:40 PM
You mentioned the TS and Tial wastegates. Has anyone used a Synapse unit? I have one I picked up brand new on the cheap that I plan to use on my ongoing project. It seems really large, but everything else about it seems just a little better than other wastegate offerings. My only complaint is its enormous size, so packaging is not going to be easy in most applications.
Scott Helmer
# Scott Helmer
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:01 PM
Damn, these wastegates sound positively epic! Gonna have to try and convince my friend Landon to get a couple of these and an EFR twinscroll for his 13B-powered Spitfire that I'm helping him build. Get some GT6 rear suspension in there (Grassroots Motorsports did that on their "Ro-Spit" and got a full 3" of extra suspension travel [1.5"->3.5"] apparently), maybe some underbody aero, and some good brakes, and go-a road racing ;).

Gotta find me some diagrams of said Spitfire so I can put my training in parametric solid modelling to good use.
Eric Hsu
# Eric Hsu
Tuesday, December 28, 2010 11:22 PM
czubaka: Holy shit the Chinaman's desire to copy and rip off intellectual property knows no bounds. Reading the Wikipedia page on the J-11, the Chinese had a $2.5 billion dollar contract with the Russian company Sukhoi to supply J-11 components so Shenyang could assemble the J-11 which was a replica Sukhoi Su-27 fighter jet. The Chinese stopped the order at 100 jets because they COPIED the J-11 and created the J-11B. Then they turned around and lied to Sukhoi saying that the avionics were outdated. I cannot believe how lame the Chinese are copying fighter jets and jet turbine engines. I'd hate to be the test pilot, but then again human life probably doesn't mean as much when there's 1.33 billion people. The Wikipedia artlicle also mentions that the Chinese engines only last a measly 30 hours. Imagine how long your Chinese fake ass wastegate's going to last.

Wikipedia Article on the J-11 and subsequent copies

Djdare: thanks for the link. Demming sounds like a smart man.

jeffball610: I have not used a Synapse unit although the designer of the Synapse, Peter, is a smart guy so I'm sure they are good wastegates. He might chime in here very soon with a virtual thumbs down for diaphragms.
Marty Staggs
# Marty Staggs
Wednesday, December 29, 2010 10:16 AM
I will say that there are many companies here in the US that are helping create this Chinese piracy influx. These american companies ask them to do it and provide specifications and samples. They need to STOP as it will only hurt their own survival in the long run.

I have no problem competing with anyone, but these poor attempts at duplication, manufacturing and selling products under another name is just simply criminal and supporting this by knowingly buying these products is just as criminal in my mind.

Also - material and laminate technology has come a long way. There is a reason why there is still somewhat of a diaphragm in our gates (its more of a hybrid piston/diaphragm if you ask me, where only 30% of the surafce area is actually diaphragm).
It still provides the smoothest, most consistent, and reliable control of the valve.

If there was a better way, we would be doing it (and we are ALWAYS looking for better ways).

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.

MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:


Copyright 2012 by MotoIQ.com
Privacy StatementTerms Of UseAdvertise