Page Options
You are here : Magazine Articles
  Minimize
12


In short more compression equals more power!  The power increases are good across the entire rev range.  Are there any disadvantages with higher compression?  Yes a few; raising an engine's compression means its octane requirements will increase.  Higher octane is needed if the compression ratio is increased significantly in order to avoid detonation.  Detonation is an explosive uncontrolled burn that really causes combustion pressures and temperatures to soar.  Detonation is the #1 killer of high performance modified engines and needs to be avoided at all costs.  Increasing compression also means more heat which must be dissipated to avoid engine damage and detonation.  That is why stock engines that must run on 87 octane pee water and boosted turbo or supercharged engines generally have lower compression ratios.

The volume of the combustion chamber also has a direct correlation to the compression ratio.  A common trick to increase an engine's compression ratio is to mill the head to reduce combustion chamber volume.  A very rough approximate is that milling the head 0.50 mm will increase the compression ratio around 1/2 of a point.  1 mm can increase the compression by around a point.  There are limits to this however.  Miling the head retards the cams in OHC engines.  Milling can also weaken the deck causing head sealing problems.

Traditionally stock naturally aspirated motors had a compression ratio of about 9-9.5:1.  This was because they had tp be able to run low octane regular gas without the risk of detonation.  Modern late model engines with sophisticated electronic engine management and more optimized combustion chambers now have compression ratios of 10:1 to as high as 11.5:1.  Built street motors that must run on pump gas have compression ratios of around 10:1 to as much as 11.5:1. 11.5:1 is about the threshold of the maximum safe compression ratio that can be run on premium 91 octane pump gas even with modern engine controls. Racing motors that run on very high octane racing fuel have compression ratios up to 13.5:1 and sometimes even higher. 

Head gasket thickness has a direct effect on compression ratios.  Many popular engines have several different options of multi layer steel head gaskets available so the engine builder can fine tune compression ratio.  HKS, Cosworth, Greddy, Apexi and others have optional head gaskets in several thicknesses for popular engines. Really thick gaskets should be avoided as they can screw up the effectiveness of combustion chamber geometry which has an impact on an engine's propensity to detonate and thermal efficiency.

Turbo and supercharged engines usually have lower compression ratios, in the range of 7-9.5:1.  The compression ratio is lower on these engines because the turbo or supercharger packs lots and lots of fuel air mixture into the cylinders.  This raises cylinder pressure considerably and thus the compression ratio must be lower to avoid excess cylinder pressure and detonation.

Pages: 2 of 3 Previous Page Next Page

Comments

Jeff
# Jeff
Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:01 AM
Should mention somewhere that your quoted AFRs are for gasoline only.
JDMized
# JDMized
Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:52 AM
@Mike:
Question: I am about to finish my 2RZ engine (from a Tacoma). Everything is balanced and blue printed.
The Arias pistons I'm running have a 12.5:1 compression. I will have the cylinder head mill down some .002, along with a thinner Cometic MLS gasket (thinner than OE). Once it's done, I'm expecting the compression ratio to be close to 13.0:1
The question is: is running 100 octane enough for the compression ratio, or I have to run higher octane?
I know I can run something higher, and it won't hurt.....but I was thinking to getting my engine tuned with 100 octane.
Thanks
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Tuesday, July 13, 2010 1:10 PM
I would not run 13:1 with 100 octane on the track but it might be ok for the street.
JDMized
# JDMized
Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:37 PM
I was thinking the other way around.
This engine was not built for the street. the engine will be run mostly at the track (occasionally I might use it on the street, but I doubt it).
You think I should run higher octane then?
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Tuesday, July 13, 2010 6:24 PM
Yeah I would run 110 or so for track use. VP C12 is real good NA fuel.
mesin_lumba
# mesin_lumba
Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:34 AM
Let say if the compression ratio is set up to be 13:01 and there is overlap in camshaft timing, so the engine will never see 13:01,doesn't it?
JDMized
# JDMized
Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:43 AM
Thanks for the tip Mike. I'll look into that.
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:08 AM
"You might hear the term dynamic compression ratio thrown around a lot. This term is a misnomer as there is no such thing as a dynamic compression ratio except for an odd Saab and research engines where the compression ratio can be changed on the fly. The engine's dynamic cylinder pressure can be affected by many things but this is not the compression ratio which is a fixed mechanical ratio that doesn't change except for the above mentioned exceptions."
Just_Wanna_Drive
# Just_Wanna_Drive
Monday, July 19, 2010 7:58 PM
A question for the guru's...

"Turbo and supercharged engines usually have lower compression ratios, in the range of 7-9.5:1. "

How can one figure what would be a safe [semi-aggressive] CR, for a given fuel [93 oct street], at desired power levels for a engine?

Very open question right???

Ok... Would a 9.5:1 piston be too high for a responsive ~375 whp SR20det on pump 93?

What are the limits [b4 boost and CR start tripping over each other] and how can we calculate them w/o blowing engines to say "well, that didn't work!"?

I know Mazworx has 90mm 11:1 CP Pistons in their 11k rpm, 1400 whp SR, But I'm guessing that's a little more maintenance than I want to budget... http://www.mazworx.com/index.php?l=page_view&p=racecars

Thanks for the insight!
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Monday, July 19, 2010 9:09 PM
Because the SR20 has very poor coolant flow through the head and the head has a lot of trouble getting rid of heat even when you correct the coolant flow, I would not recommend going higher than 8.5:1. I would just run more ignition advance or boost when running 93 octane fuel. The SR20 is detonation prone.
Just_Wanna_Drive
# Just_Wanna_Drive
Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:54 AM
Thanks Mike!

I was hoping to run at least 9:1 when I switch to my s14 SR [running stock block 9.5:1 KA-T @ ~300 whp now] to keep the response up through the rev range. SR's seem very sluggish at low to mid rpm range to me... Maybe it's just the lack of tuning in the SR's I've driven/rode in.

It's nice to have a reason 'why' now instead of the typical forum 'just because' answers. ;[]

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.

          MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:


Copyright 2012 by MotoIQ.com
Privacy StatementTerms Of UseAdvertise