
|
|
Mike Kojima posted on March 18, 2010 14:34 
The Exhaust Stroke
 |
| The exhaust or Blow stroke. |
This is where blow comes from. Nothing too exciting goes on here. As the piston once again starts to go up from BDC, the exhaust valve opens and the burnt exhaust gas is forced out of the cylinder by the rising piston into the exhaust manifold, through the Catalytic Converter, down the exhaust pipe, through the muffler and out. By the time the piston is back at TDC the exhaust valve is almost closed and the intake valve is starting to open. The cycle is about to start again.
A 4 Stroke engine has one power stroke in each cylinder for very two revolutions of the crank. Since a camshaft has one bump on each lobe, it is driven at ½ the engine speed so the cam will open the valve at every other revolution of the crank as necessary.
Imagine this stuff happening at 7000 rpm! The cycle would be repeating itself at about a rate of 60 times a second in each cylinder. At that speed it is easy to imagine a more uninterrupted flow of power coming from this seemingly herky-jerky system.
 |
| This is the PV diagram of the Otto Cycle. It plots cylinder pressure to volume to degrees of crank rotation. It is used in figuring out the thermodynamics of the 4 stroke cycle. If you are an engineering student you will study this in your thermal class. |
Modifications
Now when you are going to attempt to modify your motor for more power, you must remember that you can never get something for nothing. The factory with its rooms full of engineers usually does a remarkable job of designing an engine that can meet the many
demands made of a modern powerplant. Remember most of the guys that work for the manufacturer are not dummies, they just have to play in a game with many rules!
 |
| A highly modded engine like this twin turbo Nissan VG30DETT makes more power than stock, a lot more. It was not built to meet noise, emissions, quietness or smoothness requirements like the stock engine. It certainly was not cheap. The factory engineers are not dummies, they just have to contend with much more constraints than simply making power. |
A stock engine’s design goals are not solely to make the maximum amount of power possible. Stock engines must run smoothly and quietly, produce its power over a wide rpm range, last a long time, must get maximum fuel economy, must run without blowing up with fuel ranging from 86 to 91 octane, must make as little pollution as possible and most of all, they must be cheap to mass produce. That’s a lot of musts.
Since you the enthusiast driver is willing to tweak the compromises a bit to get the speed to feed your addiction, you can do some things that give up some of the above to get more power. To go faster you must always burn more fuel, once again remembering that you cannot get something for nothing! Usually you will have to sacrifice some things to get more power. The usual sacrifices are fuel economy, emissions, having to have a more narrow power band and perhaps shorter engine life. In the following months we will talk about the modifications you can do from headers to turbos, and how they work to turn you the customer, into a knowledgeable consumer.
Stay tuned to this channel for more!
Pages: 2 of 2 Previous Page
Friday, March 19, 2010 1:25 AM
I wanted to read the article, but I can't stop staring at that VG. What pullys are you using? It's tough to find a quality set of lightweight pullys for the VG without supporting a certain company known for their beijing xerox business model. Those red ones look nice and I don't reconize them. care to share?
Friday, March 19, 2010 7:58 AM
@ Fuergrissa: Mike will correct me if I'm wrong here but I'm pretty certain that those are the Unorthodox Racing pulleys. Unorthodox was on the market way before the rest with a full pulley set for our VG30DE(TT)s.
Friday, March 19, 2010 9:22 AM
Thanks, It looks like your right. I recognized the UR crank pulley. I think I didn't consider they were all UR because most people shy away from the stock diameter water pump pulley with an under driven crank pully and I don't believe UR makes an OD water pump pulley
Friday, March 19, 2010 11:31 AM
They are UR pulleys but the crank pulley is not UR but a Fisher active Harmonic balancer.
Friday, March 19, 2010 11:54 AM
Mike, I believe that your statement “…4 stroke engines or what is called by engineers, the otto cycle…” is false. From what I remember otto cycle and a 4 stroke ICE are different. They are similar but definitely different. The otto cycle only exists in theory. As far as I know, no one has been able to reproduce it in real life. In an otto cycle there is no “exhaust” or “intake” stage, which also why the p-v on page 2 is not a p-v of the otto cycle. The otto cycle would have a loosely similar shape but basically has the exhaust and intake cutoff that diagram. I’ll double check my text when I get home; or maybe someone else can support me or prove me wrong, but I’m 99% sure what I have said is correct.
Friday, March 19, 2010 2:22 PM
"Otto cycle is the ideal cycle for spark-ignition reciprocating engines. It is named after Nikolaus A. Otto, who built a successful four-stroke engine in 1876 in Germany using the cycle proposed by Frenchman Beau de Rochas in 1862. The ideal Otto cycle, which closely resembles the actual operating conditions, utilizes the air-standard assumptions. It consists of four internally reversible processes: 1-2 Isentropic compression, 2-3 Constant volume heat addition, 3-4 Isentropic expansion, 4-1 Constant volume heat rejection." Straight out of -Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. The otto cycle is the cycle for any spark-ignition cycle, so a 4-stroke engine is a form of the otto cycle. Diesels are a form of 4-stroke but use a compression-ignition cycle, and so its is a different cycle, the Diesel Cycle.
Friday, March 19, 2010 3:00 PM
Wait hold on after reading that again I realize RCVD is right. They are similar but the otto cycle has two stages of constant volume whereas in an engine the volume changes to be able to add the "heat" or energy neccesary for the cycle and then get rid of it. Sorry thermo was a year ago and thermo 2 isn't until the fall.
Friday, March 19, 2010 3:58 PM
Are you sure? I thought that the 4-stroke cycle was named the Otto cycle because he was the first to use the 4 stroke engine in a automobile. Otto was not an engineer or scientist so the thermodynamic study work could not have been done by him. I don't have the time to pull out my textbooks so what can you guys come up with. If you could append your sources, it would be helpful too.
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:40 PM
Here you go Mike, I found a perfect picture showing the difference between the ideal and actual Otto cycle of an engine. Also in my 1st post it says that it was invented by Beau de Rochas, but Otto was the first to build a working engine. This picture is from: Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach 5th Ed. by Yunus Cengel & Michael Boles http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=32842103&l=21d4b99852&id=29007866
Friday, March 19, 2010 10:31 PM
I was more interested in information supporting that the 4-stroke cycle and Otto cycle are not the same which I think is incorrect. RCVD usually has something interesting to say so I wanted to see his sources. I also think historically Otto was not the one who actually built and conceived the 4-cycle engine, it was Daimler and Maybach. Otto was the organization guy of the trio.
Friday, March 19, 2010 11:03 PM
Oh I got ya. I think I see what he was getting at though with the difference in the change in volume but I'll let him explain what he meant. Damn thermo books misleading me.
Friday, March 19, 2010 11:11 PM
As far as I know, the 4 stroke cycle is the otto cycle with stuff showing the intake and exhaust flows, hence the roundedness at the ends of the cycle.

Saturday, March 20, 2010 3:34 AM
My source is same as aj_gilbs except I have a different edition but the information/diagram he quoted is exactly the same. But the main difference I was originally referring to was that there isn’t really an “intake/suck” or “exhaust/blow” step in the otto cycle. Otto cycle is a closed system, ie. theres no mass flowing in or out. Another thing to note is that both otto and 4stroke ICE have 4 steps but there not the same. In the otto cycle, the only thing that happens in the 2nd step is heat is being added to the system. The piston does not move at all in the 2nd step. In the 3rd step you have your expansion. Steps 2 and 3 is basically the bang stage in the 4stroke ICE. So because of that, the piston in an otto cycle only strokes 3 per cycle. The otto cycle is also an ideal cycle (non existant in the real world) so it’s a reversible process. Also as aj_gilbs mentioned you have constant specific heats on the 2nd and 4th step. Heat is introduced and rejected from the otto cycle on the backs of magical unicorns. And finally a mineor difference is the otto uses pure air as its working fluid. So those are the reasons that I think they are different. As far as the history goes, I have no idea. Nor do I care b/c I think the otto cycle is stupid, just like pants. I understand their purpose but I still think it’s stupid. IMO
Saturday, March 20, 2010 3:59 AM
^^edit*...otto cycle only 2 strokes per cycle.
Saturday, March 20, 2010 6:10 PM
lol, "heat is introduced and rejected from the otto cycle on the backs of magical unicorns". Brilliant. Though I think thats not the kind of source Mike was looking for heh. Very familiar with suck, squeeze, bang, blow even read the first renditions of some of this in Sport Compact. Though the Otto cycle is all new to me, more to learn. Good stuff.
Sunday, March 21, 2010 12:45 PM
another correction in that post. i said "...you have constant specific heats on the.." i meant constant specific volume. I appologize, i should learn to proof read. Anothing difference i was thinking about was that i don't think there is "combustion" in an otto cycle. I'm not sure of the true defintion of the word; but if heating air is not considered combustion then no combustion takes place in an otto cycle. So if thats true then just the wording itself can prove that their different. A 4 stroke internal combustion cycle is not the same as a cycle that has 2 strokes and no combustion. Alex, i meant to imply that the heat is brought in and out of the system by nothing. The otto cycle is an ideal cycle so there is no component that brings the heat in and out. It just does.
Sunday, March 21, 2010 3:24 PM
I briefly looked over my books last night and I believe that you are speaking about semantics. The 4 stroke cycle is the Otto cycle, not the ideal Otto cycle but still the Otto cycle. My reference book is this; The internal combustion engine in theory and practice by Taylor http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=6992 And the High speed internal combustion engine by Ricardo The latter has some interesting stuff on how tuning factors affect the shape of the curves.
Monday, March 22, 2010 12:12 PM
Ah i see, so theres an acutal and a ideal for the otto cycle. Thanks for clearing that up. Yeh ive heard that book by mr. ricardo is pretty baller. I'll have to check that out one of these days
Monday, March 22, 2010 12:14 PM
I just happen to have an original copy of it. It took me 20 years of searching.
 
|
|
MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:
|