Page Options
  Minimize
27

 

Jim Wolf Technology Releases Nissan VG30DE/DETT Mechanical Cam

MotoIQ Staff Report

Jim Wolf Technology has introduced their mechanical cam for the VG30D series NissanV6 twin cam engines. JWT’s mechanical cam is the biggest, most aggressive and the most powerful VG cam on the market. The JWT mechanical cam has the most area under the lift and duration curve for the ultimate in volumetric efficiency. Area under the curve is what makes power and torque and is more meaningful than simple lift and duration numbers.

This unique cam solves some of the problems that have been holding back the VG from making serious power. Although the VG uses direct bucket lifters which are usually pretty light, it also has hydraulic lash adjuster built into the lifters. Nissan did this to make the VG’s valvetrain maintenance free. The hydraulic lifters are heavy and contain oil which also has a lot of weight.

This weight can contribute to valve float. The hydraulic lash adjusters also pump up at high rpm and keep the valve from seating properly. When revved past 8000 rpm, a VG will float its valves, and then the lifters will pump up, holding the valves open. The engine will not run properly for several minutes after this. If the car is continued to be driven hard with the valves not closing completely, damage to the engine can result.

The JWT cams use lightweight Tomei mechanical bucket that uses shims under the bucket to adjust the lash. Although setting up these lifters is somewhat time consuming, the light weight allows higher revs and a more aggressive cam profile with more area under the lift curve. A lighter valve spring can be used that has less friction as well.

The JWT cams do require a more involved shim fitting procedure set up to adjust lash and have such an aggressive profile that the cylinder head casting must be notched on either side of the lifter bore to clear the lobe, but for a highly modified VG, this cam will prove essential for making the ultimate in power. As a note, the newer VQ and QR engines all use mechanical valve actuation and select fit buckets to adjust the lash so this is not a radical thing. Most performance motorcycle engines also use a similar system to adjust lash as well.

Look for us to do a full evaluation of these cams on one of our project cars in the near future.

 

Comments

tyndago
# tyndago
Monday, September 28, 2009 10:03 PM
Sounds the same as the RB26 head setup. Shim under bucket.

How much lift and duration ? I have some 312 12 mm lift cams for an RB26 on the shelf.
canyoncarver
# canyoncarver
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 4:14 AM
Awaiting evaluation.
Tech@EPR
# Tech@EPR
Friday, October 02, 2009 11:32 AM
272 duration with .433 Lift. I worked with Clark (owner of JWT) on the springs. He found ones that I was looking for that worked quite well with these camshafts.
tyndago
# tyndago
Friday, October 02, 2009 12:34 PM
272 11 mm of lift ish. So they are like baby cams then..... ha ha. Like a mild street car RB cam.

I really don't know much about the VQ, but most of the older cams were all hydraulic ?
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Friday, October 02, 2009 3:44 PM
All except the Tomei cams but they are smaller. These are the biggest cams on the market.
tyndago
# tyndago
Saturday, October 03, 2009 10:36 AM
VG.... I meant to say I don't know much about the VG. I know a bit about the VQ. A bit about the VR. I think its all going to be about the VR soon. The big turbo kits are here, so the next thing to break is the engine. 1000 hp soon out of those things.
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Saturday, October 03, 2009 4:30 PM
The VR is going to be limited by the odd iron cylinder liners spalling
tyndago
# tyndago
Sunday, October 04, 2009 7:57 AM
So far the VR has done over 700 whp with stock engines. How long they will last at that level is questionable.

However nothing that can't be fixed with some sleeves in the block.
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Sunday, October 04, 2009 9:52 AM
I sort of don't like sleeves due to structural compromises in the block and deck sealing issues. Things like sinking as well. Sleeves are sort of a crap shoot, lots of variables if they will give problems or not.

I think shit can the plasma iron and spray some nikasl in there!
Tech@EPR
# Tech@EPR
Sunday, October 04, 2009 11:23 AM
i want to correct the info I posted previously. After going through my notes on the cam specs for this kit. they are 276 duration with .433" lift. So far the highest on the market. Im having Clark do two more profiles for me to run in the upper class of cylinder head development. Hope to have these out by early/mid next year.
Mike Kojima
# Mike Kojima
Monday, October 05, 2009 11:03 AM
Also you must note that area under the curve can be more significant than lift and duration figures.

Eyeballing the profile isn't accurate either, a fat looking roller camish profile doesn't mean lots of area under the curve. A roller profile is shaped that way because of the small diameter of the roller. The valve motion isn't necessarily more radical.

Whoops that was supposed to go in the companion thread to this at TT.net

The main limiting factor on the VG is the lifter bucket diameter. The JWT cams go right to the very edge.

Sean doesn't the RB use the same diameter buckets?
tyndago
# tyndago
Monday, October 05, 2009 11:06 AM
Whats the diameter on the buckets for the VG ? I have never measured an RB bucket. I can maybe do it one of these days.
Tech@EPR
# Tech@EPR
Monday, October 05, 2009 1:13 PM
34mm if I'm not mistaken

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.

          MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:


Copyright 2012 by MotoIQ.com
Privacy StatementTerms Of UseAdvertise