
|
|
Eric Hsu posted on May 24, 2011 00:10 

I originally started writing this article back in 2009, but never finished it. I finally got around to it, but some of the info isn't exactly new anymore. Enjoy:
I remember when I was around 14 or 15 years old and the street races were the most exciting thing in the world at the time. Immediately the first cars I became enamored with were the Mazda rotaries. There were a few at Four Lanes in the City of Industry and many more at the Compton/Wilmington races. At Four Lanes in the City of Industry, it was Edwin Mangune in his turbo RX-3 and Frank Choi in his supercharged RX-3 that were the Rotary kings of the time. You may know Edwin from Hawk Brakes or Frank Choi from Battle of the Imports now, but back then they were just kids in their late teens who had fast RX-3s. Whenever either one of them arrived at Four Lanes, everybody stopped and stared. It didn't matter who you were or whether or not you liked rotaries. The sound of their rotaries idling and loping at 1000 rpm was crazy. Their giant intake and exhaust ports coupled with poor air/fuel distribution at low speed from the carburetor(s) and pre-CFD intake manifold designs made the engines sound mean as hell even at idle.
The RX-2s and RX-3s were the only imports that could hang with and sometimes beat the V8s, GNX Grand Nationals, and VW Bugs. What about the old Toyotas and Nissans you ask? The old Japanese piston engines might be nostalgic and pretty cool in their own way, but in the whole scheme of things they were pretty damn slow. Multi-carburetor turbo systems were clumsy and difficult to tune. Ever try tuning a triple Weber turbo Nissan L28? Good luck! The rotary only needed one big carb. It was the Rotary engine that was holding it down for the imports. This was pre-VTEC and pre-fuel injection and the Rotary was the superior Japanese engine at the time.
It was all about Rotary power for me at the time too. I even went and bought a R-100 first and then a RX-7 a little later when I was 15. Neither of them ran: the R-100 needed a fresh engine (the 10A with the 6mm carbon apex seals was dead) and the RX-7 was a theft recovery so it was basically a shell. I already had visions of grandeur even before I had my license and was trying to take on project cars even before I knew how to build them. I never finished either car: the R-100 was parked on the street and got hit in a hit and run and subsequently towed away by the city. I had to sell the RX-7 because it was taking up space in my buddy Will's garage. There were many more Rotary powered vehicles to come later in life, but more on those another day.
When I was 15 years old (circa 1988), my buddy Will bought a used dark Midnight Blue 1979 RX-7 SA22C with a street ported 6 port 13B, a single Dellorto 48 side draft carb, Racing Beat headers with dual exhaust, chrome 15x7.5" Epsilon 3 piece wheels and a direct port nitrous system. Let's not forget about the dual vertical Sonic Turbo mufflers which was the Rotary trademark of the time. I was to find out later that 6 port engines did not flow as well as ported 4 port engines, but anything's pretty buff when you're 15 and don't know jack shit. This was my first experience with a RUNNING rotary. Will bought the car before he knew how to drive a manual so I had to drive it home for him. It was the very first time I physically drove a manual car and I was surprised how easy it was. It probably helped that I read up on how a clutch system worked like 20 times the night before. I was already familiar with driving cars having been sneaking out my dad's Z31 300ZX shortly after turning 14. You do all kinds of stupid shit when you're young...

Here's a sample of 15" chrome Epsilon wheels on a SA RX-7. This is not Will's car.
Anyhow, Will didn't really know much about cars. He just liked cars. He was cool enough to let me work on his car though. I guess I had a good track record. My friends and I all used to be into road bikes before we got into cars and I did all the work and mods on his Centurion. At this point I didn't have much experience with cars, but having read a lot of books written by professionals (beats the shit out of the forums of today) and a basic understanding of engines, drivetrains, and air/fuel delivery, I knew far more than Will did. I was also doing slave labor (polish this, sweep that, clean this, etc.) at my uncle Norman's European (Benz, BMW, and Porsche) shop so I saw a lot of cool cars getting built, but he would never let me touch the cool stuff. Will and I brought the RX-7 over to my uncle's shop and I asked him what he thought of the car. The RX-7 seemed a little sluggish up top to me. It seemed to stop pulling around 7000 rpm and I thought a ported rotary engine was supposed rev forever. I asked my uncle what he thought and after driving it around the block he thought it might have been a bit lean. In his words (he grew up in Watts/South Central LA so you'll have to imagine a Chinese dude with a black accent) he said something like, "You call this fast? Foo, this shit is slow! Get in this Porsche and jump on it [he was pointing to a beautiful all steel metallic burgundy slant nose wide body 911 turbo owned by some Indonesian royalty dude] and look in the rear view. You'll see two wide ass [it had 16x13" BBS RS 3 piece wheels with GIANT Pirelli P7s on it] black marks if you jump on it in any gear. I ain't too familiar with rice burners, but it might need some bigger jets and fresh plugs. Off idle it's a bit lazy too." My uncle was an old school street racer too, but he raced Mustangs and BMW 2002s in his day. I just told him, "Wait until you hit the nitrous, dude. We'll run that Porsche." He laughed his ass off of course.
I was totally into reading about everything at the time and had already read the Rotary Bible of the era which was the Racing Beat catalog and another Mazda Rotary racing engine book that featured a lot of info from Roger Mandeville. I cannot remember the title or author but it was a good book so I'll have to dig it up and share one of these days. Neither of these books talked much about carb tuning, but I had already read a different book about rebuilding and tuning Weber and Dellorto carbs so I had a basic understanding of how carbs worked. So heeding my uncle's advice and using what I learned in the book, I bought a cheap ass tool to sync the carb, changed the main jets to a couple of increments larger, fresh cap and rotor on the distributor, new Ultra spark plug wires, adjusted the timing, and got some fresh NGK B9EVs. MAN did the fucker wake up. I'm sure Will's fuel mileage ate shit, but the car started to lay down black marks of its own in 1st and 2nd gear (without the nitrous). That same night Will and I took the car out for a test drive after the work and we were ripping it down one of those roads that ran along the freeway and was separated by a 16' tall brick sound wall to keep the noise away from the residential areas. It was that night that I fell in love with the Rotary. I was able to spin the engine to 8000rpm for the first time and I realized that it didn't want to stop pulling. The exhaust was blasting off the sound wall so we got the audible enjoyment of the exhaust also. I only shifted at 8,000 because the old school Rotary car redline buzzer came on at 7,000rpm and it just freaked you out. It just kept going, "BEEEEEEEEEEEEEP!!!!!!!!!" After getting comfortable with the power, I remember shifting at 8500rpm. The sound of a normally aspirated rotary exhaust screaming at 8500 rpm, the Dellorto making mad intake noise, the oil and fuel smell of an old car, and the rotary car redline buzzer kept Will and I entertained for hours that night. We just kept blasting everywhere. I'm surprised we didn't get chased down by cops and arrested that night. It was pretty stupid for a 15 year old without a license, but it would have been worth it even if I got caught. The carb jet change wasn't rocket science, but it was really cool to see something you learned from a book work in action especially when you're 15 and don't really know WTF you're doing.
Here's an example of the rotary car rev limit buzzer. Imagine that noise the entire time you're above 7000 rpm.
Unfortunately, two months later Will put the car into a wall and totalled it before we ever got to use the nitrous. He replaced the RX-7 with a BMW 850i so that was it for Will and Mazdas, but it was REALLY fun while it lasted. I will always have a soft spot for the Mazda rotary. My crew and I built A LOT of FDs at XS back in the day and I enjoyed turbo rotaries even more. So whenever I see news from Mazda about the Rotary engine, I am glad to see that there is continuing development with the Rotary. Mazda didn't do too great in my opinion with the Renesis 13B since it is heavy, has a relatively low power output, and is fragile when turbocharged, but Mazda is promising better rotaries in the near future.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:36 AM
Eric, do you still have the rotor housings you offered me back when I still had my first FB? I'm looking at another today, and may be building a 13B at some point in the near to distant future.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 5:50 AM
I've been meaning to register for a while, this put me over the top. Thank you Eric for sharing some of your rotary insight with us, any chance you could pick up an RX-7 to do battle with Mike's LS3? I'm not a rotary guy myself, love the sound of a 26B and I'd rather have a piston engine but it doesn't mean that I don't want to see an "Eric Spec" engine running "Eric Spec" turbo(s). Also, I do remember the Mazda Millenia. The wheels are hollow spoked 15x6 11lb wheels, the KL V6 is one of my favorite Mazda engines, etc. They are heavy and automatic only though.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:28 AM
Makes me miss my 89 RX-7. It was a lot of fun in the twisties, but as an NA car and an owner with limited mod funds, it was slow and drank gas more quickly than my 83 land cruiser. My Mazdaspeed3 is traction challenged and underdamped, but faster out of the box than my RX ever was, efficient enough to be a commuter, holds a car seat, and has that Mazda FTD factor.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:12 AM
Romulan: Yes I probably do. Email me at eric at motoiq dot com if you need any 13B-REW engine parts. I have enough new and good condition used parts to probably build 4 or 5 engines. SixCylinders: Welcome to motoiq. Actually it's Jeff's FD with the LS3. If I had more time, yes, I would build an FD just to show all of the LS people that they made a mistake. Unfortunately I do not have the time these days. I barely have time to write for MotoIQ anymore. I would love to do it though. darooda: Rotaries absolutely have the shittiest MPG/displacement ratio. The MS3 has a great engine too if you can get around the Nazi throttle control.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:15 AM
I'm still intrigued by the rotory, but it also doesn't seem practical. I love the idea of a stratospheric rev range, but the low torque, fragile nature and high fuel consumption don't do it for me. I'm sure Eric will argue rotory motors are not fragile and just a product of poor tuning, but they seem to break a lot. The sound of a rotory at 9k rpm is awesome though and I can look past some of its shortfalls. But that damn BEEEEPPPP doesn't do it for me. Sounds like the car is honking its horn at you telling you to stop pounding on it. I'd love to own a RX3 some day. But it has to have a 4G63T in it ;)
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:47 AM
Great article Eric. I think this engines didn't get a real chance until now, even though Mazda did a terrific job with this technology, picking up where NSU and Mercedes Benz left off. Mazda showed everyone it's true potential when they won the Le Mans race some years ago against all the usual big boys. Audi has just released a new prototype, the A1 e-tron electric car with range extender (a bit like your Chevy Volt), only this time the range extension comes courtesy of a single, 254cc wankel engine, revving constantly at about 5000RPM (where it reaches peak torque, like it makes sense to me?) so there seems to be new doors opening for our beloved rotaries. If just for the sake of great engine music, I hope they keep evolving. Should anyone here not know how amazing these engines can sound, just take a minute or so, you won't be sorry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox2wgHqrNy0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9675TKafw3g
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:02 AM
Direct injection is what the rotary needs to be a modern engine! Are the aluminum side housings coated with something trick for seal compatibility and to make them a suitable wearing surface? Please do not label me as an LS fan, I believe that the LS is one of the best engines for a DRIFT car for quantifiable reasons. Not everything in the world.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:21 AM
I never understood why rotary displacement is calculated the way it is. Shouldn't it be multiplied by 3 since there are 3 surfaces of the rotor and they are all participating in combustion at the same time? Isn't saying the 13B's displacement is 1.3 liters like saying a 2JZ's displacement is only 500cc?

Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:15 AM
jeffball: No, I'm not blinded by reality. The reality is that a rotary engine is fragile much like a Subaru EJ25 is fragile. Everybody blows up both engines and this is 100% always due to poor tuning. However, the difference between an EJ25 and the 13B is that any idiot with half a brain can slap together an EJ25 because it is a traditional piston engine. That same idiot with half a brain will look at a rotary and wonder WTF is going on. So while both EJ25s and 13Bs are both fragile, the rotary gets the bad rap because very few people know how to build them relative to a piston engine. Not only is the rotary considered "hard to tune", but the are also difficult to assemble and are considered a "bad" engine because. A slapped together EJ25 will last 500 miles, but a slapped together 13B won't even start. A 4G63 powered RX-3 would be cool actually. I was thinking of building a VQ powered FD at one point. Marillionado: I think the 787 won because the Jaguars, Porsches, and other leaders broke, but I'm glad the 787 won regardless. It made motorsport engineers consider the rotary as a serious engine...if only for a moment in time. Awesome vids BTW. There's nothing quite like the sound of a 4 rotor on track. Mike: I'm sure Mazda will address the side housing issue. Even the iron housings were gas nitrided from the factory. I would imagine something like Nikasil, Alusil, or even a plasma iron spray. Dusty: Each rotor displaces 654cc including the 3 chambers for a total of 1308cc. According to Wikipedia, "Displacement is 3√3radius·offset·depth, multiplied with the number of rotors (note that this only counts a single face of each rotor as the entire rotor's displacement)"
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:47 AM
@Eric: Exactly my point. The power and fuel consumption levels of a 13B make more sense if all 3 rotor faces are counted for a total displacement of 3.9L. This new 16X has a "total displacement" of 4.8L, which is V8 displacement packaged into a smaller, lighter, higher-revving package.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:28 AM
Eric, I remember Will's car. It had the reputation as being the lowest, darkest tinted car in Southern California. He definitely had to find alternate routes around every speed bump in town with that body kit. GTPs are my favorite race cars. They should let the rotaries like the Mazda 787B back in LeMans. That car sounds great in the straights! If rotaries started winning again maybe other people would start to do research into the engine. But I guess that would cut into the bread and butter piston side of things and piss a lot of people off. I guess it's up to LeMans to decide who can compete in their race and which Champion Cars to exclude. Sounds like a boring old boys club to me.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:07 AM
Eric: I loved the trip down memory lane! Who doesn't remember doing stupid crap like that while a teenager!? The Wankel rotory, IMO, is possibly the most unique way ever to look at an ICE. Efficient, not yet. Wicked noise and fun, plenty to be had. I'm hoping for a brief follow up on understanding the apex seal problem. I've never heard of rotories as bad motors, just apex seal problems. Mike: "please do not label me as an LS fan". OUCH! You can label me as the LS fan then! I'll take the heat. I've just never been a fan of the LS swap into the various drift platforms without more strigent penalties for a "motorsport". I know FD has been a lot better this year, i'm just saying! I just need to convince Eric and Cosworth to do some "unique" LS work and show the world a new way to approach the LS, 'cause I love unique!
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:31 AM
VQ powered FD would be awesome. No idea whether it would be better than a LS though. LS can make well over 600hp with just bolt ons including a cheap single cam. VQ takes some serious investment (not just money either) to get there. GTP is the best!

Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:37 AM
I've never really thought about the rotary engine's displacement come to think of it. Its probably because it cannot be altered. Well...each rotor moves at 1/3 crankshaft speed so it takes 3 crank revolutions (1080°) for 1 chamber (654cc) to complete the 4 cycles of combustion. In a 2 rotor engine, there are two chambers that complete the combustion cycle per revolution so I THINK that is why it is considered to be 1308cc. That was probably the bulk of the controversy surrounding rotaries has been about throughout the years with race sanctioning bodies. Some sanctioning bodies calculated displacement at 2x and some 3x for rotaries. The RX7.com website has an interesting article on rotary displacement that breaks down the equivalency of a rotary engine's displacement to a piston engine's. Basically it goes like this: A piston engine takes 720° to complete the combustion cycles of all of its cylinders. So how many chambers can complete combustion cycles in 720° in the case of a rotary? In a 2 rotor engine, 4 chambers complete the combustion cycles and so therefore a rotary should be considered equivalent to a 2.6L (654cc x 4) piston engine. This actually sounds pretty legit to me.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:47 AM
Yep 2.6L makes more sense to me too! Also in 2003 when the Renesis won best new engine, they classed it in the 2.5-3.0L displacement category. Nothing beats the sound of a single turbo 20B with external Gate....
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 12:10 PM
13bs are grate when you turbo them they make good power and rev for ever but in my experince the are not good as dd
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 2:53 PM
Eric, great read. You know I love my rotaries...fbv I'm glad you still get enthused by them as well. I did some research this spring and so far preliminary tests have shown that the 16X is something like 30% more fuel efficient than the 13B-RENESIS, while making more torque throughout the entire rev range.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:52 PM
Heres a small clip of a four rotor setup being used in a drift car in NZ which may interest rotary fans : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfl05j82vpE&feature=fvst
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:58 PM
I loved this article, and I hope Mazda has the sense and guts to continue developing this engine. Great article, and I'll overlook the shot Eric took at the Miata.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:46 PM
Damn it Eric, now I have to buy more books because of you! I mean, I was going to have to anyway because my friend wants his 6-port 13B in his Triumph Spitfire and wants me to tune it, but now I'm going to have to buy those books way earlier just to satiate my thirst for knowledge! That reminds me, how much porting CAN be done on a 6 port? Everywhere I look just basically says "not as much as a 4 port", and doesn't really explain further. We're only shooting for about 350-400 hp turbocharged (hopefully with a nice, wide powerband), but I want to make sure it can be done reliably before I commit time into massaging more power out of this engine. I think it'd be real nice to see companies like Cosworth and Mahle and such putting the same kind of research effort that you see in aftermarket piston design into aftermarket rotors and such; assuming that one could actually improve on Mazda's design of course.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:24 PM
Wonderful article Eric. Shared to FaceBook..

Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:34 PM
Jim: Will's car didn't have a body kit. That's how low it was! Will's car was cool as hell wasn't it? M-P: If Dave Coleman decides to ever visit MotoIQ again, he might be able to drop some more knowledge on the 16X since he is the Mazda R&D engineer. He's the one that told me about it way back in 2007 I think. Miata Phil: Glad you enjoyed the article. BTW, I take pot shots at all cars including the ones I own and like. My criticism knows no bounds I guess. Scott: I still believe in printed books written by the truly knowledgeable people or professionals over forums. You can get some info from forums, but you just have to have the bullshit or "ignore dumb asses" filter on full power when you're reading. I think most books you'll find on rotaries will be older now, but that's fine because the engine is pretty much the same so most of the info will still apply. Back in 1992 I turbocharged a non-turbo 1991 FC with a stock 6 port engine. I ran a T04B H-trim compressor with a .81 A/R P-trim turbine on an HKS exhaust manifold with a 40mm HKS wastegate. With a 3" exhaust to HKS 60mm rear mufflers, no cats, and 8psi of boost, it easily pegged the analog needle on the old school Clayton dyno at 250hp at the wheels. Actually the needle went beyond the 250hp mark and pegged the gauge. If you interpolated that would be a tick over 300hp I think. The old Clayton dynos read pretty low too. While far from scientific, the car was probably as fast as a 350whp FD on the street and definitely faster on the freeway. I think your goal of 350-400hp will be no problem; especially with a ported engine. I have never actually ported a 6 port side housing so I can't tell you what the limitation is, but I believe it just has less "meat" so you cannot remove as much material. Plus the bridge between the primary and secondary port is another restriction. If you have the housings in front of you on a bench, I think you'll be able to see what I'm saying. The Clayton I used was a bit newer than this one, but it looked similar to this:
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:20 PM
So sweet. The 16X sounds like all things to all people. Slap one in a nouveau RX-7 and sign me up.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:41 PM
Also, with rotaries there are no pumping losses. I don't know how that factors into the notional displacement figure, but it's what makes rotaries awesome aside from compact size.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:53 PM
Just read on Autoblog that Mazda is thinking about going with an RX9 based on the MX5 chassis with a rotary/electric hybrid combination.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:09 PM
There are pumping losses with a rotary as will all IC engines.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:24 PM
Haha, word has it Audi might beat Mazda to the market with a rotary/electric hybrid. I like one rumor I heard of an electrically-boosted turbo. I always wondered why no one tried it.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:35 PM
@Mike: I must have something confused. There is no loss of energy where a piston normally has to be pushed up and down through three unpowered strokes, leeching power from the other cylinders or counting only on inertia in the case of a 1-cylinder. A rotary only has to coast, overcoming friction and the vacuum pressure during intake, but doesn't have to push any dead weight around.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:22 AM
Eric, Yeah. I'd say that Will's car was one of the high water marks that people were striving for at the time. It stood out in a big way, and was a big eye catcher. I remember it had nice 17" wheels, which were the big wheels at the time, Ha ha ha! Yeah, I could be wrong about the body kit. I just remember talking to him by his car once and seeing the cracks on lower side of his front bumper. It was funny when he mentioned that even though he had done all that stuff to his car, he didn't get to see the exterior of it that much. Like he was sad because he was missing out on how bad ass his car looked when cruising, by always being on the inside. Ha ha ha! Ah, Will.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 8:33 AM
Dude.... I use to have a Centurion road bike when I was a kid too. My uncle and sisters use to let me drive cars around the neighborhood when I was 13. As for rotary displacement, the international engine awards people classifies the 13b as a 2.6L. Basically, a 4-stroke piston engine has one power stroke for every two crank revolutions. A rotary has one power stroke for each eccentric shaft rotation. So to make it the equivalent of a 4-stroke piston, they take the physical displacement of the rotary and double it as it gets two power stroke for two crank revs.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:01 AM
ScottyG: The rotary still suffers from some pumping losses. Unless an engine had some active port timing control/throttle control strategy to eliminate pumping losses, the engine will still have pumping losses. Probably less than a piston engine however. Jim: Will's car had 15x7.5" wheels. I think they looked big because the car is so small. If you ever get the chance, walk up to an SA RX-7 and you will see how small it is. It's easy to forget how small cars used to be because everything is so damn big now. Khiem: Before building cars, I used to build road bikes so I decked out Will's Centurion with all Campagnolo parts. I decked out my Nishiki with Dura-Ace Shimano gear. It was a prelude to how I would build cars in the future: buy a cheap ass Japanese car and use top of the line parts costing a shit ton of money. We would ride like crazy all summer long all over so cal doing 100 mile days almost every day. It was good fun those days.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:37 PM
Eric, even at over 100% VE there are still pumping losses. I will explain next time I see you.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:06 PM
Damn, I always dreamed about owning a bike with Dura-Ace stuff. I bought my bike for $12 at goodwill with some variety of Shimano index shifters and I just love the instantaneous shifting. I find that it's much harder to find good parts cheap for a car than a bike and my back wheel just seems to eat up tubes (the bike shop popped 2 in one day at their expense just mounting them!) so I avoid spending the money to fix it up.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:15 PM
It was awesome to see the Speedsource/Riley RX8s win Daytona. There was a great article about them in a RCE issue over the past year (can't remember which month) If you like rotaries and circuit racing, Mark Maloney's 3 Rotor/Xtrac powered RX3 is awesome. http://www.reallymeansounds.com/forum/attachments/motorsport/23013d1243517529-carribbean-motorsport-circuit-racing-championship-madness.jpg http://www.maloneyracing.com/images/Mark1.jpg
Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:04 AM
Those old FBs really were small. Here is one that parked next to my car. Its hard to tell from the pic but the size difference was Huge! https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/4p8llADZ_h9quxx1ItCWLQ?feat=directlink
Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:34 AM
Eric, Wow, 15" wheels. Yeah, that car's small but I would never have guessed 15" wheels. Maybe because it was also slammed, skewed my perception. Man, how auto standards have grown.

Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:50 AM
Eric: Yeah, I've spent a good damned long time pouring through various automotive forums of just about every denomination, and you're right about there being some pretty good nuggets of gold to find if you "polish" enough of the s@#$ on the internet (admittedly though, I've spent less time wasting my time doing so as of late due to not having to "polish" motoiq.com and simply spending more time figuring out what few questions I have left myself, in my head). That being said, I suspect that most of what I'm interested in learning these days is best learned through book reading and class taking (suspension design, etc.), and I will definitely be on the hunt for some good rotary books fairly soon. Might even be willing to trade an early 80's Schwinn Voyageur for some harder to find books/parts to anybody that might be interested (technically a joke, but I do have one in better than average condition, and certainly don't have the time or money that they deserve to invest in it or my early 80's womens Schwinn World Sport right now). Oh yeah, I got a chance to work at Performance Bicycle last year (part time as a sales associate, helped to start up a new storefront), and pretty much put together about a fifth of the bikes in the store with the exception of making final adjustments (we had a sort of assembly line going). As such I got to put my hands on PLENTY of nice, expensive carbon fiber/aluminum bikes. Now, if only us mere mortals (non-head shop mechanics) got to put together the few german Focus brand bikes that we had. Doesn't get too much better than those babies, that's for sure. Mike/ScottyG: I could EASILY be wrong, but wouldn't there theoretically be pumping losses ANYWHERE where there is friction or a mechanical transfer of power (such as gearing or a crankshaft/eccentric shaft)? Hoss: You should see one parked next to a Triumph Spitfire 1500 some time. I'll try to remember to take a picture next time I'm at my friend's place and post it up. The thought of one of those with a fiberglass or maybe carbon fiber wide body kit with some better aerodynamics, improved suspension/brakes/chassis stiffness, and a decently powerful turbocharged 13B really gets my blood flowing! Good thing that's what my friend Landon wants to do with his Spitfire and his "spare" 13B (I say spare because he bought an SA GSL-SE in relatively rough shape almost entirely for the 13B to put in his Spitfire, and the rear axle/brakes in his absolutely pristine white '84 GXL that has less than like, 50 thousand miles on it).
Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:47 AM
Mark Maloney was here in Jamaica just this past weekend racing the RX3. It's such an awesome car. Very well built and the sound is just incredible. He is still not able to beat David Summerbell in TA-1 on our local circuit though. Some pics towards the middle of this page: http://www.wheelsjamaicahost.com/wheels_forum/index.php?topic=148935.1850
Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:36 PM
Heartbreak! http://blog.caranddriver.com/mazda-not-working-on-rx-9-odds-of-a-new-rx-7-are-slim-but-real/
Friday, May 27, 2011 9:05 AM
Thanks for the Rotary article. I've always been curious how you go about building a solid and reliable Rotary engine, admittedly I know nothing about these motors. I strongly agree with most forums being trash, occasionally you will find some helpful tips but a huge amount of time is spent weeding through trash.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011 6:17 PM
Nice Post, and love the history past present and future of the rotary. but ahh comeon mane, no need to dog the other lineup of Mazda. IMHO its 1 of the most under rated lineup of good fun cars out right now past, present and hopefully future. the Millenia was a hit and miss with the miller sc motor, but its still a pretty good car, with styling that still looks good even today the miata may be 1 of the most important cars of the 90's (especially in bringing motorsports to the masses) the 626 (i had a mx-6) was/is still a pretty good sport compact for its day. (I owned 1 with over 200k and it had no probs and once again the styling was far ahead of its time) the mazdaspeed lineup of today is pretty good also. yeah their heavy and fwd but when looking at that market I think they have the best offering for it. and honestly if i was looking for a crossover the cx-7 is the best looking and still slightly fun to drive of the bunch. I got Zoom-Zoom deep in my blood and they make alot of nice cars that never get the respect they deserve. anywho btt does anybody have any more up 2 date news on the new rx? I had/have fears that it may have been canceled in the light of our economical downturn. the rx brand is not really Mazda money maker as much as its an identity. right now car makers seem to be putting their heritage on the back burner for the interest of surviving the drought.
Friday, June 10, 2011 3:00 PM
http://www.insideline.com/mazda/mazda-envisions-rotary-sports-car-of-the-future-with-audi.html : "There are now less than 100 engineers working on the engine, says a senior insider at Mazda, but a newly developed laser ignition system promises a big step forward. Laser ignition does away with the need for spark plugs, making it easier to seal the Wankel's trochoidal combustion chamber for improved efficiency and reduced hydrocarbon emissions." That's right -- lasers.
 
|
|
MotoIQ Proudly Presents Our Partners:
|