You are here : Forum
MotoIQ Forums Minimize
Header
Last Post 06-07-2011 08:37 AM by Fly'n_Z. 21 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
02-27-2011 03:17 PM  

We are primarily into racing, but because we've run into the problem over and over of not having parts available we've decided to start making them too. So we formed 2J-Racing to do both.

There is no decient header on the market for the QR25DE Nissan motor, and though we don't currently run a QR powered vehicle (we do have a B13 and a QR, harness, ECU, and electronics to do a swap).

I have a friend into drag racing who runs a high compression QR and JWT's new C1 camshafts that wanted a "real" header w/ a 3" collector per JWT's suggestion. This one will go on his car, but before it does, it'll get digitized (in the US by a US company) so we can tweak the different demensions based on feedback and dyno testing to dial it in. The math says the runner are too long, which is good. We can go too long and then go too short, and then try something inbetween to dial it in. Once it's digitized making dimater, length, and step changes will be a few clicks away.

I've done pipe work before for turbo set ups, intercoolers, and exhaust but never a header. Lucikly this was cake and nothing like I thought it would be. I "cheated" and used a prefabbed slip on collector for the first go to simplify things. We also have a slip on with runners that are 8 inches shorter. I put the runners parallel as soon as I could so swapping slip on collectors would be pretty painless for testing.

We are waiting on a run of alternator relocation and AC delete brackets so we can do a full race header with all of the primaries that come off of the head 6" before they turn down. Right now we have to clear the alternator. Everything is designed to work with a 3" head pipe that bolts to a 3" catback, because we think race first, and street is what we tow our cars to the track on

Any feedback is welcome.

 

spdracerutUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:613
spdracerut

--
02-27-2011 05:09 PM  

What ID tubes are you using?  What's the redline of the engine?

Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
02-27-2011 05:35 PM  
OD is 1 5/8 (id is larger than the port in the head), steps up to 1 5/8 ID piping, primaries are 32", collector is 3".

Stock redline is 6200, most people don't go over 7k

Stroke is 100mm, piston speeds are retarded high





GCMBobUser is Offline
MotoIQ ASE Certified
MotoIQ ASE Certified
Send PM
Posts:404
GCMBob
Cayman Islands

--
02-28-2011 03:47 AM  
Yeah they look a little long for a 7k redline. Also i would think you would want a long tune 4-2-1 for circuit to broaden the power curve.
Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
02-28-2011 04:05 AM  
It's modular. The long slip on collector slides off and a slip on collector with 8" less runner length slides on. Both collectors bolt to the same 3" headpipe. So making length changes on during testing is simplified.

Once it is digitized and the critical areas are marked, we can change diameter easily. The bends are pretty much standard angle bends. Once we get to that point each runner will be a single CNC bent mandrel pipe.
smartbombUser is Offline
MotoIQ Super Genius
MotoIQ Super Genius
Send PM
Posts:1904
Mike Kojima

--
02-28-2011 06:36 PM  
I think the primaries are way too long.
spdracerutUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:613
spdracerut

--
02-28-2011 08:55 PM  

What's the current length?  Running some very rough numbers without really knowing anything about the engine, I think a primary length of 18.375" (from exhaust valve to collector) will give a bump in the 5k-6k rev range.  Give or take a thousand   I'd be very interested in the resuts to see if the theory I'm working with is even close or not.  Though..... 27.5" might work pretty well too.  It looks like they're over 30" now?

Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-01-2011 03:12 AM  
The point was to go too long by the math, and then go shorter.

Currently the runners are 33-32", with the other slip on collector, 24-25".

I don't think there will be too much shifting of the TQ to the right with the current intake manifold, but we're working on that too.
smartbombUser is Offline
MotoIQ Super Genius
MotoIQ Super Genius
Send PM
Posts:1904
Mike Kojima

--
03-01-2011 04:22 AM  

Ah ok, you are running a slip collector and are going to cut shorter to tune it?  You should run the Burns bspec collector with the tuneable venturies to play with that as well.

Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-01-2011 05:52 AM  

once we get closer to something optimal it's something we'll consider refining.  But, until the induction side of the motor is improved upon, I don't think a header will produce spectacular gains. There is a less than ideal intake to exhaust ratio going on with the motor as it is. We're working on the head and intake too.... that's where the motor is going to come alive.

Schoenfeld slip ons, really cheap ($35), really easy to use and destroy and not feel bad about.

 

      

 

 

 


 

Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-19-2011 06:44 PM  

I finally finished up the mid pipe. We'll be at the dyno Tuesday to see what this thing does.

 

smartbombUser is Offline
MotoIQ Super Genius
MotoIQ Super Genius
Send PM
Posts:1904
Mike Kojima

--
03-19-2011 08:22 PM  
Really eager to see what this does.
Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-20-2011 06:16 AM  
We bought an N/A 2.5 Spec V to use for development.

We'll also be testing our bolt on adapter for VQ 70mm TB to QR 60mm intake manifold.





spdracerutUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:613
spdracerut

--
03-20-2011 11:55 AM  
Posted By Mike Kojima on 03-19-2011 10:22 PM
Really eager to see what this does.


Me too.  I'm going to go with the shorter runner one.

Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-20-2011 01:00 PM  
The car we bought doesn't have an extended redline. I really want to work on power in the 4500-7000 rpm range.

The test car does have JWT S1 cams and .060 milled off of the head. I'd love to drop some big JWT C1s in it. That's the cam any N/A stuff we do is going to run, so I'm sure it'll end up with a set.
Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-21-2011 09:27 AM  
with the milling of the head (unknown amount off the deck) the compression is somewhere in the 11.3-11.6 range (up from 9.5:1 stock) figuring in both a stock deck height and a 0 deck.

Now I really wish this thing had an extended redline and the larger cams for testing.
Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
03-27-2011 02:50 PM  
had trouble getting the dyno. Owner was leaving for South America to do some track support. I went ahead and shipped the header out to the customer. He will be doing some dyno testing and re-tuning. Based on feed back we'll tweak the design and make another set.
dilopUser is Offline
MotoIQ Newb
MotoIQ Newb
Send PM
Posts:3
dilop

--
05-31-2011 08:04 AM  
hi, I was wondering if you got any info from your customer...I'm actually following this "slipping collector technique" to get my headers done/tune...GA16DE btw...
Big JUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:559
Big J

--
06-01-2011 07:27 AM  
The shorter runners were up about 3-5hp and TQ over the longer runners, with both making pretty big gains TQ gains down low and 7-8hp gains up top over the ebay wonder flow headers he had used and tested previously.

This is a great inexpensive way to do some testing and verification. If you have a budget, Burns Stainless has a good "dyno test" setup.... but if you are racing a Sentra like us, your budget is probably SE-R sized like ours.

Common sense tells me that going shorter, or with a larger diameter at the current shorter length might net some more gains. Because of the primary diameter I used, I could also keep things the same and go with a 2.5" collector just to see.

We currently have the header back and being digitized (at a large and well established US based company) and so we can do some dyno testing of our own on the development car we picked up.
spdracerutUser is Offline
MotoIQ Engineer
MotoIQ Engineer
Send PM
Posts:613
spdracerut

--
06-02-2011 05:56 AM  
Posted By Big J on 06-01-2011 09:27 AM
The shorter runners were up about 3-5hp and TQ over the longer runners, with both making pretty big gains TQ gains down low and 7-8hp gains up top over the ebay wonder flow headers he had used and tested previously. 


Ha, I guessed right!  There could probably be some more gains in tweaking either length and/or diameter, but getting a nice merge collector on their as opposed to your quick/cheap prototype version should give you a decent gain too.

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>


Active Forums 4.1


Copyright 2012 by MotoIQ.com
Privacy Statement Terms Of Use Advertise