I have a 240SX with a turbocharged KA24DE. I was running a T28 from a Pulsar GTiR, with a 10 psi wastegate actuator, 550cc injectors, Z32 MAF, and a RS Enthalpy tuned ECU, all on stock internals. AIl was well and I put about 5000 miles on the setup with no issues. And then I got greedy and cheap. Greedy for more boost... and cheap so that (I'm embarrassed to say) I bought a generic boost controller off ebay. Turned out to be a leaky piece of crap, and while I intended to turn the boost up to 12-13 psi, instead it spiked over 18 psi the first time out, which was more than the stock pistons could handle. #3 and #4 = blown ringlands, at the very least... I haven't had time to investigate fully yet, all I know is when I pulled the spark plugs, those two were soaked in oil.
So the car has been sitting, as I don't have the time or money to rebuild it yet. This has been leaving me with plenty of time to think about what I want to do with the car. My ideas have ranged from rebuilding the KA as capable street motor to withstand 400 whp on a daily basis (and then running about 350 whp), to swapping a VH45DE, to completely frankensteining something. I generally tend to dream more on the realistic side of things, but the following is more on the crazy side for me.
I just recently read through all the blog posts about project spec V, and building the QR engine.
My question is this. Would it be possible to do this exact build on a longitudinal QR25 from a Frontier? There are several points of concern for me.
First, is the fully counterweighted crankshaft interchangeable between the transvers and longitudinal motors?
Second, does the longitudinal version have the same balance shaft system, and will the JWT removal kit work on the longitudinal engines as well?
Third, what are the differences between the heads? Can the spec-V valvetrain work on a Frontier QR?
Now, the reason I ask about all this is because I'm wondering how easy or difficult it would be to drop a QR25 in a 240SX. I know most people's initial thought would be "why in the world would you want to do that?" or "what in the world makes you think that would be possible?" Well, hear me out for a minute. I know full well that this would be an extremely expensive undertaking, but cost, time, and money are not my concerns at this point. This is meant to be a discussion of what it would actually take to do this.
First, what would I (ideally) like to do?
The overall build would be a QR25DET, or possibly QR25DDT (More on the DDT in a moment) in a 240SX, running a twin scroll Borg-warner EFR 6258. I want something that will be reliable as a summer daily driver, and able to withstand weekend abuse without flinching. I would want it to be very streetable with a wide powerband and 300-350 peak whp.
Second, why the QR?
1. The QR25 is the replacement for the KA & SR series motors.
2. It is lighter than both of them.
3. The long stroke will spool a turbo quickly, and have good torque characteristics, which works well for my intended goals.
Third, what makes me think it will work?
1. The QR25 is the replacment for the KA & SR motors.
2. The S-chassis car came with both the KA & SR motors.
3. The Frontier also came with the KA motor.
4. Newer Frontiers now have the QR.
So my logic is as follows: If a Frontier KA can be used in a 240SX, can a Frontier QR be used in a 240SX?
I have never heard of this being done before, and I expect it would be an expensive procedure requiring a fair amount of fabrication. That is part of the appeal to me. Not just making it work or cobbling it together, but making it look professional and oem quality. This is essentially my idea of what Nissan could build if they chose to resurrect an S-chassis car.
Now, back to the QR25DDT... the QR25DD is a direct-injected version of the QR engine that came on the JDM P12 Nissan Primera. If the transverse QR head can be made to work on a longitudinal QR, then I could use the head from the DD engine for this build. Why would I want to use direct injection, you ask? Turbocharged Direct-injected engines are storming the market. They have broad, flat torque curves, and still get decent fuel economy. I'm imagining a QR25DDT with 350 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque from 2000-5000 rpm, a similar powerband to Audi's 2.5 TFSI 5 cylinder engine. Sure, this may be a pipe dream, but I'd love to work on it and see what results could be acheived.