Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-09-2009 09:39 AM |
|
I've been having a hard time deciding where to go with a motor build. My current motor runs great for street duty and has survived countless dyno pulls and runs down the drag strip and 50,000 miles under pressure, but...... you always want more.
The QR is a good motor, but design "features" limit potential w/o going broke either in the wallet or the motor. It has the lowest rod to stroke ratio os any production motor ever as far as I know. Piston speeds, rod angle, and side loading, all work together to keep the motor fairly RPM limited. Nissan redesigned the half counterweight crank and made a 8- counter weight version, been there done that (not on my car), pretty happy with the results, but it still thrashes around pretty good at high RPMs.
So the SR20DE and the QR share the same bore spacing and main journal size, so the 86mm stroke crank will drop into the QR block where the 100mm stroke crank used to sit. The factory QR rod is 143.03mm long and the pistons have a 32mm compression height. W/ and SR20 crank in the block there is a 14mm reduction in stroke, half of 14mm is 7mm, 143+7=150mm. That's the rod length the motor would need to keep the 32mm compression height.
The SR20 has a 48mm rod journal, I'll tie that in in a minute, you'll like where it goes. So if I were to spec out a custom rod it would be a c to c of 150mm, a wrist pin of 20mm, a big end diameter of 2.008mm, and big end and pin end widths of 22.81mm, and that would let me use a QR piston, or spec a custom piston based on QR deminsioins. I allways poke around what's available first to see if there is something else I can use. I came up with options besides customs: a Mitsu 4G63 rod is 150mm c to c, runs on a 45mm journal, BE width of 28.32mm or 26.37mm depending on 1g or 2g application, and pin diameters of 21mm or 22mm.
It depends on how much I can cut down the big end width and/or how much width I can add to the rod journal on the crank as to wether or not it'll work by cutting the journal on the crank from 48mm down to 45mm. Seems like a lot of machine work and that custom rods would be the better bet. BUT, there are 147mm 4g63 rod for stroker motors. But then the rod would be too short..... right? Except that the length the rod is missing is the same as the difference in the diameter of the crank journal and the journal the rod is sized for. To get the 3mm back in rod length and cut the crank journal down to fit the rod big end diameter you could kill 2 birds with 1 stone and offset grind the crank 3mm . That's really 3 birds because the stroke would change from 86mm to 92mm, sweet, destroked and stroked at the same time. One route would get a 1.7:1 rod/stroke ratio, the other would get a 1.58:1 r/s ratio.
I'm going to be having some long talks with my machinist coming up soon. Chances are it's not going to work w/o getting custom rods at a minium, but I'm really digging the idea of a 92mm stroke. Widening the journals and off set grinding will require a little welding because of the way the filet radius is cut into the crank, and cutting 4-5mm width out of the big end of the rod is probably going to pose some problems with bearing width, or require new tang slots to run different bearings. The pin ends would need to be re-bushed to take a 20mm pin also.
I figure I'd kick the idea around here to see what input you guys might have. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-09-2009 11:11 AM |
|
It looks like Eagle makes a rod that will be much easier to fit than the EVO rods. BE width 23.75, c to c 148.894, 18mm pin, 1.771 journal way closer. That'd put it at an 88.2mm stroke. They also make a 151.5mm rod with the same specs but a 21mm pin. That'd be a 83mm stroke, just over 2 liters displacement. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-10-2009 07:01 AM |
|
I'll have to see what the pin end looks like on the Honda rods. Hopefully it doesn't get too thinned out opening it up 2mm. That rod and a 88.2mm stroke will create a 1.68:1 rod/stroke ratio, more than good for the 8,200 redline I want, but more than good for 9-10k too. As far as pistons, because of the decrease in stroke, a piston that makes 9.5:1 compression w/ a 100mm stroke is going to be too low with a shorter stroke. The simplest solution is going to be to use a 10.5:1 compression piston for the 2007 Spec V QR25, which would put compression in the 9.1-9.4:1 range depending on stroke, perfect for a moderate boost level street motor. It's a cast factory piece but the top ring land is 1mm thicker than other QR pistons, and little thermal barrier coating, call it a day. Since the piston won't be pulled as far down in the bore it definitely opens up room for oil squirters. The 2007+ QR motors have them from the factory so I'll pick some up and see about retrofitting them. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-10-2009 07:08 AM |
|
Posted By Big J on 10-09-2009 01:11 PM
It looks like Eagle makes a rod that will be much easier to fit than the EVO rods. BE width 23.75, c to c 148.894, 18mm pin, 1.771 journal way closer. That'd put it at an 88.2mm stroke. They also make a 151.5mm rod with the same specs but a 21mm pin. That'd be a 83mm stroke, just over 2 liters displacement.
There's no real quench area in the head, so I could play with a negative deck height and and use the longer rod, not lose stroke and get away with a factory piston. The Frontier piston has a built in quench or squish area and a thicker ring land, but I don't want to start playing with trying to get that clerence right, although the benifits might be worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-13-2009 12:34 PM |
|
I can only come 1.5mm off center |
|
|
|
|
smartbomb
 MotoIQ Super Genius Send PM Posts:1940

 |
| 10-13-2009 02:48 PM |
|
I have lots of comments, just no time to write them down. If you look at the new parts of the site you can see we have been busy lately  |
|
|
|
|
eric
 MotoIQ Super Genius Send PM Posts:327

 |
| 10-13-2009 11:52 PM |
|
Good ideas, but are you stuck to a Nissan engine? Sorry I do not know your background or what car you have. I'm thinking if you are going to spend all of that time, effort, and money into this engine, why not just drop in a Honda K20A? K20A + turbo = 400whp on stock internals and pump gas. Drop in some valve springs and you have an engine that revs to 9000rpm also. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-14-2009 05:59 AM |
|
I drive a Nissan Sentra Spec V w/ a QR25DE. As the car sits it puts out 315ishHP and 300ft/lbs on the daily. 1.43:1 r/s ratio, stupid rod angles, super high piston speeds, tragically low rpm potential. They make a 2.0 outside the states, I think the 2.5L version was an after thought and has all the characteristics of an overdone stroker motor. I think I'm stuck on this Nissan motor in particular because it's such a bastard child. The goal is to come in around $2.5-3K on the build, enjoy the technical challenge, and throw my turbo rig on it. |
|
|
|
|
sticky667
 MotoIQ ASE Certified Send PM Posts:217
 west covina
 |
| 10-14-2009 06:06 AM |
|
Eric, we could use a 92mm Cosworth stroker kit to help the process. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-14-2009 08:56 AM |
|
That would be the worst business decision ever, lol. |
|
|
|
|
eric
 MotoIQ Super Genius Send PM Posts:327

 |
| 10-14-2009 10:27 PM |
|
Sorry man, there is no SR20 Cosworth crank in production. It has been designed, but never manufactured. That's a shame because it's a pretty nice crank (by design). |
|
|
|
|
smartbomb
 MotoIQ Super Genius Send PM Posts:1940

 |
| 10-15-2009 11:28 AM |
|
I think he was meaning a QR Cosworth anything, You would seel like 2 of whatever, one to big J and one to me.... |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-15-2009 01:52 PM |
|
I'm going to keep the intake manifold simple this go around..... modified B16 manifold adapter and a plenum bolted to it............ way easy to replicate
http://www.rossmachineracing.com/plenumextrusions.html
or



total drag race manifold |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-25-2009 01:14 PM |
|
JWT has some monster camshafts being released that should be the ticket for this motor. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-28-2009 09:18 AM |
|
while I'm playing bench racing/building............... Instead of running 1 adaptor for the intake manifold I could run 2 stacked together. the second opened up to the larger diameter of the adapter, 500-600cc injectors in the first rail and 1000-1200cc injectors in the 2nd rail. Swap out to a 2006 ECU w/ a factory wideband and build a fuel system that can run on gas and E-85. Primary injectors for gas and injector resolution that can be tuned for a good idle and driveability, and then run both rails for E-85. The voltage feed to the injectors is a common wire, interrupting the feed to the second rail will shut them down. A secondary power system to power both the second rail and supplementary fuel pumps would be cake. The map switching function and ethanol ratio function of the Osiris ECU tuning would make it feasible on a stock ECU but combining injectors with different latency ratings might be a pain in the ass to figure out the tune on. I'm waiting on the day when someone realizes this motor came in a RWD format w/ a 5 speed in the 2005+ Nissan Frontier and slips one in a 240sx. |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-19-2010 02:45 AM |
|
pistons are here, rods are being cut!!! 89.5mm bore, 86mm stroke, 150mm rod, 9:1 compression.
|
|
|
|
|
Fly'n_Z
 MotoIQ Staff Send PM Posts:159

 |
| 10-19-2010 07:57 AM |
|
Glad to hear it Big J. This should make for a very interesting QR motor build and certainly one that's a little more comfortable operating at elevated RPM. So is it a custom connecting rod you've had to go with or were you able to make something work off the shelf? |
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 10-19-2010 10:31 AM |
|
a friend of mine decided he needed this motor in his car so I'm putting one together for him. The rods are custom through K1/Carrillo. $625 for a set of 4 and no minimum. If you gone the custom route before, $625 is pretty good. The pistons are a change on an off the shelf QR25 piston, which I'm pretty sure is one I spec'd out a few years back, with changes for compression.
|
|
|
|
|
Big J
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:559

 |
| 02-13-2011 03:25 PM |
|
I figured I could update this now because the custom bits are done. Rods took a little longer than expected. Pistons were done months ago because I get special service from JE 






86mm SR20 crank next to 100mm stroke QR25 crankshaft

SR20 crankshaft in QR25 block. Thrust area needs to be widened up, or thrust washers narrowed, or custom thrust washers. Block (or crankshaft) needs a touch a clearnce work due to forging line on crank causing some rubbing. Snout diameter needs to be reduced to accept timing gears, and the register is 8 bolt vs 6 bolt. JWT has a flywheel for this application.

|
|
|
|
|
spdracerut
 MotoIQ Engineer Send PM Posts:631

 |
| 02-14-2011 05:38 PM |
|
Nice.... can't wait to see this thing come together! |
|
|
|
|